From the last couple of years, a new formula 'create dis-order and win' has been discovered, and it has given extremely successful results. The main beneficiaries of this formula are the small groups of people, who are failed to convince the large number of people through logical arguments, and hence decided to create agitation in society in order to achieve their vested interests.

The foundation of this formula is laid on the fact that few people are more than enough to control a large number of people, provided that they use unlawful means. For example, half of a dozen people are sufficient to hijack an aeroplane with the help of weapons. Same number of people can organize a successful bank robbery. Quarter dozen can plan a successful robbery in a house.

The formula was first used by lawyers and political parities against Pervez Musharraf. The lawyers and political parties launched a full-fledge agitation across the country and shook-up the whole society. Consequently Musharraf stepped down, and they won.

Observing the successful results of the formula, Sufi Muhammad of Swat Valley created lawlessness in the valley and used sophisticated weapons against the population and Army. The militants of Sufi Muhammad bombarded more than 200 girls schools, market-places and government-owned properties. After committing destructive activities, the militants used the population of valley as a shield to hide from Army Operation. In order to avoid any further damage of the people of the valley, the government decided to stop the 'hide and seek' game with the militants, and un-willingly signed a peace-treaty with Sufi Muhammad. Hence, Sufi Muhammad won.

In the mean time, lawyers again gathered in order to restore the deposed Chief Justice Iftekhar Chauhdry. A political party PML-N, that basically belongs to a particular province, and takes care of the interests of that province, played a vital role to fuel the anarchy. A nation-wide chaos erupted, and the CJ was restored. Dis-order won again !

So, if you belong to another small group of people, and so far failed to achieve your goals through lawful means, just do not worry. Simply start using unlawful means, and spread anarchy in the society. Create dis-order and win.

.. the turn-out of general elections in Pakistan was always below 50%. To be precise, it is even below 40%. In-fact some sources even say that the turn-out in general elections was always below 30%. The constituent assembly that comes out as a result of this election is generally considered as the 'representative' assembly. Isn't it a joke ? The political stupids, who are actually rejected by more than 60% of the voters, are considered as 'representatives' of the whole nation. It is not a joke; its a fraud.

The reason that why 60% voters dont come out to cast their votes is very clear. They know that these politicians are not the true representatives. They know that the candidate who is asking for the vote is either a feudal lord, or an industrialist. And if by chance it does not belong to both of these power-centric categories, it must be a personal favourite of any feudal-lord or industrialist. They know that these political leaders, who try to become the champions of democracy, do not promote democracy within their own parties.

In order to make people participate in elections in great numbers, and in order to bring the true representatives of people in the assemblies, a major replacement of political leaders is badly needed. Majority of the voters is looking for a new political leadership. They need a political leadership whose character must be as clean as it is supposed to be a true leader.

They say 'dictator' to such a person that comes in power without getting elected by the people. Whenever spoken, this word 'dictator' signifies a particular historical and political back-ground with some particular personalities. In Pakistan these personalities are generally known as dictators, and their names are Ayub Khan, Yahya Khan, Zia-ul-Haq and Pervez Musharraf (so far). And of-course, globally dictators are not considered as ideal rulers.

Political leaders claim themselves 'representatives of people' as they come as a result of elections. In Pakistan, Asif Ali Zardari and Nawaz Sharif are the chiefs of two biggest political parties. As they are democratically elected personalities, therefore they are considered as 'representatives of the people'. Statistically, a vast majority of the people of Pakistan is consisted of middle-class, lower-middle class, poor class and the people living below poverty line. These classes encompass more than 90% of the population. Whereas Asif Zardari and Nawaz Sharif belong to such a class that is commonly known as 'elite'. Asif Zardari is basically a feudal lord, and Nawaz Sharif is a leading industrialist of Pakistan. The fact that both belong to the privileged class, creates a big question mark on the perception that they are the representatives of people.

History of their respective political parties (PPP and PML-N) says that when they come in power, instead of serving the people of the land, they work for attaining more and more power. They use every mean to tighten their grip on power. They manipulate law, they amend constitution for vested interests, they use force to suppress opposition and they do everything that a 'dictator' is supposed to do. So in true sense of words, the democrats become the dictators.

But the best part of their story is, in the eyes of world they are still considered as democrats. However these democrats do not follow one habit of the dictators, i.e. the 'economic stability' that the dictators provide to the country.

I was thinking that do we really need two dictators, which are wrongly considered as representatives ? Or its better to have one dictator, that provides economic stability ?